Search for: "Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Recently, a Louisiana Court of Appeal (“the Court”) addressed this question when determining whether a Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:35 am
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
It filed suit against Coca-Cola, contending that Coca-Cola’s labeling of the “Pomegranate Blueberry” product is so misleading that it violates the Lanham Act. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 4:35 am
Coca-Cola Femsa, a Mexican bottler partly owned by Atlanta-based Coca-Cola Co., also ran an online ad for a male route driver, aged 25 to 30, at least 5 feet 9 inches tall, between 154 and 176 pounds, with a good presentation. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
The City of Los Angeles appealed from the district court's grant of partial summary judgment in favor of BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles (BCI Coca-Cola). [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
Coca-Cola Co., No. 09 CV 395 DLI RML, 2013 WL 7044866, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:55 am
Coca-Cola's shape mark too smooth forthe General CourtCoca-Cola falters in EU General Court on bottle shape trade mark: On Wednesday, the EU General Court issued its decision rejecting Coca-Cola's Community trade mark application to register a 3-D sign for the contour of a bottle without fluting. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:34 pm
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:06 pm
It was also signed by company representatives from: Campbell Soup Company, Cargill Inc., Coca-Cola Company, Conagra Brands Inc., Costco Wholesale, Hershey, Kellogg Company, Land O’ Lakes Inc., Mars Inc., Nestle U.S.A., PepsiCo Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am
Coca Cola Bottling Company provided the initial rationale for what became strict products liability. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 5:57 am
A trademark can also be granted to unique packaging such as the shape of Coca-cola's bottle, building designs, color, sound, and even fragrance. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
It seems unlikely that Coca Cola would be the successful company it is today had Coca Cola been forced by regulations to disclose its recipe. [3] There is a popular misconception that all of the ingredients of Coca Cola are listed on the product label. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
It was organized by the American Beverage Association to fight a proposed three to ten cent tax on soda, sugary drinks and energy drinks to help fund health care reform in the United States....its extensive membership consists mainly of lobbying groups for packaged food and soda companies, chain restaurant corporations and the world's large food and soft drink manufacturers and distributors, including the Coca-Cola Company, Dr. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
It was organized by the American Beverage Association to fight a proposed three to ten cent tax on soda, sugary drinks and energy drinks to help fund health care reform in the United States....its extensive membership consists mainly of lobbying groups for packaged food and soda companies, chain restaurant corporations and the world's large food and soft drink manufacturers and distributors, including the Coca-Cola Company, Dr. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:32 pm
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, 450 F.3d 476 (10th Cir. 2006), explained, some courts have adopted the “cat’s paw doctrine. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:37 am
Earlier this year, The Coca-Cola Company reported double digit dips: a 11% drop in revenue and a 20% plunge in profit. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Examples: Only thing he thinks registrable is Coca-Cola logo with bottle; not FedEx logo, Yahoo! [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:15 pm
The S.D.N.Y. also dismissed a putative class action filed against The Coca-Cola Company, alleging that its Gold Peak® “Slightly Sweet” tea leads consumers to believe the beverage was low in sugar and calories when, in fact, sugar is the second most predominant ingredient. [read post]
